Archive for the ‘The Small Screen’ Category

Trouble the Water (2008)

Tuesday, May 19th, 2009
Trouble The Water (USA) (DOC) Directed by Tia Lessin; Carl Deal
 
Though Spike Lee’s more comprehensive and broader-scoped When the Levees Broke remains to date the definitive work on the subject, Trouble the Water found its way onto a number of best film lists for 2008 and was nominated for an academy award. Tia Lessin and Carl Deal, who’d worked for Michael Moore in the past, were in New Orleans to shoot a documentary on National Guardsmen returning to their home state, Louisiana. While scouting near the Superdome they happened to run into aspiring rapper Kimberly Rivers Roberts (aka Black Cold Medina) and her husband Scott, lower ninth ward residents who had been stuck in the flood. Kimberly had purchased a video camera on the street two weeks previous and managed to shoot footage of the flood as it was happening. Deal and Lessin watched the footage and decided to change the direction of their film, deciding to concentrate on Kim and Scott and their experiences. The film is effective mostly because of the visceral effect of the footage and the humanity of Kim and Scott and their family and neighbors. The human face on such a large tragedy allows us to become personally invested in seeing how it all turns out for them and theirs. While the footage of the flood itself is of poor technical quality, the visuals still do an extraordinary job of demonstrating what some of these people actually went through. The overall film, as constructed by Deal and Lessin, is at its best when following Scott, Kim, and the rest, although for some reason it jumps all over the place, making the time line of events shaky at best. There is good information to be gleaned - 911 calls; local news reports; interviews from the bumbling Mike Brown from FEMA and mayor Ray Nagin. From Kim’s footage, we see individual acts of bravery, generosity, and kindness from some who are directly impacted, but the lack of resources, disenfranchisement, and abandonment on display is pretty shocking. There is also a telling sequence where Scott talks about going to a mostly abandoned military base with a crowd of desperate, now homeless citizens and being turned away and even threatened by the men stationed there. Scott and Kimberly Roberts are far from saints - they breed pit bulls, have each had troubled pasts that include drug dealing, and Scott bears an ugly scar on his face that is evidently the result of Kimberly cutting him, but they are representative of a poverty stricken section of people who were simply forgotten about during this tragedy. The soundtrack includes gospel music and some rap from Kimberly (The Roberts’ company is called Born Hustler Records). There are questions about how ethical it is that Kim is given no formal credit on the film, but the relationship between subject and doc filmmaker often constitutes a less than holy melding of agendas. Regardless, Trouble the Water is a documentary worth seeing. It is not yet available on DVD, but can be seen on The Independent Film Channel. 
 

Alabama Cattle Rancher Wins Survivor Tocantins

Monday, May 18th, 2009

Last night, an easygoing Alabama cattle rancher James Thomas Jr., aka “JT”, 24, beat out his long-time ally on the show, Yale graduate and corporate consultant Stephen Fishback, 29, to win the 18th season of Survivor and its accompanying 1 million dollar prize. Despite being one of the best athletes/physical competitors in the show’s history, and consistently winning immunity idols (including the last two), JT didn’t receive a single ejection vote throughout his forty days in Tocantins, located in the Brazilian highlands 

Along with JT and Stephen, the merged tribe included Ben Wade, 37, a  pony-tailed girls soccer coach from Missouri who referred to himself throughout as “Coach”, told wild stories of his own world adventure travels and derring-do (including a convoluted tale about being captured by natives in The Amazon while setting a solo-kayaking world record), and constantly blathered on about his own bravery, strength, leadership abilities and his idea of a “warrior ethos” and a “warrior alliance” that likely existed only in his mind. The kayaking record has been checked, and is unconfirmed by any legitimate body. In addition, further questions have come up about some of “Coach’s” other outrageous claims on a website he maintains. 

Early on “Coach” was partnered with Tyson Apostol, 29, a pro-cyclist mormon from Utah, his smarmy, equally self-absorbed right-hand man who at one point said he enjoyed seeing people cry. “Coach” himself, however, has to rank as one of the most memorably reviled contestants in show history. Finishing in fourth place was ex singing group En Vogue member Taj Johnson George, 37, a mother of two married to ex NFL running back Eddie George. Taj was popular among most of her island mates, and actually originally brokered the exile island alliance with Steven, later joining with JT to create what would become the dominant group in the game. Taj had been aligned with JT and Steven for a number of weeks before being blindsided by the two in favor of the weaker Erinn Lobdell, 26, a talkative Wisconsin hairdresser who wound up finishing third. Once enmeshed in Coach’s unsuccessful warrior alliance, Alabama middle-school school principal Debbie Beebe, 46, finished in sixth place.   

At the final tribal council, JT argued that the fact that he’d stayed loyal to strong strategic player Fishback by choosing to face him in the final as opposed to selecting the weaker Erinn demonstrated his sense of honor and loyalty. Fishback argued that playing the game in the shadows, in part relying on JT’s physical capabilities and likeability was a legitimate strategy. When pressed though, he also admitted that if given the option he likely would’ve broken his promise to JT and chosen Erinn to face in the finals. JT expressed anger and hurt at this revelation, though after the vote, on the live show, admitted he had been acting for the benefit of the jury in order to garner sympathy votes, and in reality understood why Fishback might’ve made that decision. 

JT was announced as the winner by Probst in front of his 15 fellow contestants and a live studio audience populated with their family and friends. His soft-spoken, Southern accented Mom was interviewed by Probst, and she said she’d been telling her son for three years he could win on the show.  JT was brought to tears upon learning he had won the vote (4-0 with the remaining three votes unread), saying it was “the happiest I’ve ever been in my life, obviously.”  JT also won the Sprint vote for most popular/best player, and said he planned to go into business with Fishman, saying he was obligated.

“Coach” provided some entertainment toward the end of the broadcast, bringing with him a sealed envelope from a lie detector administrator attesting to the validity of his kidnapping in the Amazon story, or at least part of it. Earlier in the show, Probst revealed that he had previously offered “Coach” a chance to take a lie detector test, but the offer was refused. Despite the test results confirming “Coach’s” probity, the contestants and audience seemed less than convinced.

Lost Concludes Season 5

Friday, May 15th, 2009

Okay, I admit, I was not on board from the beginning. Perhaps that disqualifies me from commentary altogether. In fact, I have still never even seen a number of the episodes from the first few seasons so my perspective is forever that of an outsider, completely baffled as to the root of some of the shenanigans and contretemps that seem to unfold on that crazy, cursed island. Maybe it is merely that keeping me from taking the goings-on very seriously.

I am entertained by the show, at least enough to keep watching - I like the fast-paced nature of the constantly shifting, multi-character plot-line, which has no real regard for time or continent, and likes to keep upping the ante by piling plot twist upon plot twist upon red herring upon plot twist; I like the array of interesting and different characters; I enjoy the colorful photography playing on my widescreen HDTV. I’m just honestly not sure what it all means. Although, that’s probably partly the point, right? Perhaps the show is just an elaborate allegory for the randomness of human existence? Perhaps the show’s ethos is something like this - “life plays games with our minds, dude - just like the show, so take the good with the bad, roll with the punches, and make the best out of it.” I feel like one needs to take a zen approach to watching Lost - don’t sweat the small stuff; take pleasure in the details; go with the flow and be one with the Island… I don’t know. Maybe that isn’t it at all.

Lost confuses me, and it isn’t just the plot. While JJ Adams’ showrunners Carlton Cuse and Damon Lindelof are clearly smart, hip people, who like to name (drop?) characters after famous thinkers and pepper the show with literary references, and while the show itself obviously has a kind of post-modern sensibility demonstrated by the ever present inclusion of pop references and wry comebacks in the dialogue, there is also this earnest, and at times, frankly, poorly written and acted, melodrama, that intrudes on each and every episode. I get that this is an inherent part of the fabric of the show - what confuses me is whether or not these cheesy spots are intentional? Are we, as audience members, supposed to laugh or think it’s ironic when Kate (Evangeline Lilly) pauses for long seconds with a well-placed tear in her eye to stare longingly at the rugged, Fabio look-alike Sawyer (Josh Holloway), or when Jack (Matthew Fox) punctuates a point by looking vaguely (but meaningfully) at Kate, letting us know there’s a raging current of emotion and pain behind his weary-thousand mile stare? This seems to me to be the kind of writing and acting that goes on in soap operas, and in some ways Lost is one giant violent, time-warpy soap.

I am not, a literalist per say, although I have always struggled to connect to comic books (or graphic novels or whatever), as well as certain sci-fi, horror, and action related material. Put it this way - I’d rather watch a Daisy of Love marathon than try to discover what that gosh darn anime is all about. While I understand the deep attachment some develop with mythological franchises, and sympathize with individuals who separate themselves by acquiring detailed knowledge of their intricate workings; and while I get it that fantasy and role playing is inherently tied into these strong connections people feel, I simply have never felt a kinship with this type of stuff. I guess I’m forced to come clean and admit to being a film nerd who doesn’t play video games or like comic books. There - I said it. Also, while I appreciate the stylings of, say, a David Lynch, or a classic surrealist like Bunuel, I almost always feel manipulated by their more avant garde work and wind up resentful because of it. I understand the general intent (if not always all the symbolism in the details) - which is to provoke, to prod, to play with the conventions of narrative filmmaking, to promote visual metaphor and defy the limits of tightly structured plot, to… well, lets’ just say it - to fuck with the audience. I’m all for that. Huzzah. It goes on all over the world in art schools and in modern art galleries and museums. It’s a good thing. I will go so far as to acknowledge that those who adore Lynch and his like are probably right - but for me it’s like Max Ophuls - I know the films are great, I appreciate their artistry and construction - they just don’t hit me on an emotional level.

Despite my lack of Sci-Fi pedigree, I do like Kurt Vonnegut and Phillip K Dick and Harlen Ellison. I like 2001; Stalker; Solaris and a host of other films about space. I like a bunch of post-apocalyptic, dystopic, and time travel films too, like A Boy and His Dog; Blade Runner; The Terminator; Minority Report; Gattaca; Twelve Monkees; Last Night; Time of the Wolf; and The Stand. I like it best when films like these remain in the realm of the plausibly possible, and when it involves real people experiencing incredible things. I like when Hurley is confused and questioning his own sanity, and better yet when physicist time traveler Daniel Farraday is clueless, because, well, they should be - I mean, the shit is weird, dude.

Lost is fun. It’s entertaining. And while obviously there is an epic struggle between good and evil infusing every aspect of the show, it’s ultimately the character’s story-lines, more than anything, that make it interesting for the likes of me. This season we learned more about Kate’s fierce devotion to Aaron; Jack and his demanding doctor father, as well as his abiding love for Kate; Sun’s loyalty to Jin; Juliet and Sawyer’s relationship; Miles and his scientist father; young Ben Linus and his Dad; Ben and his daughter; Desmond and his fierce connection with wife Penny Widmore and their child, and of course, the various machinations of her meglomaniac Dad, Charles; Hurley and his Dad; Locke battling his own self-hatred and his destiny; Saheed’s tie in with Ben and his dead girlfriend and his revenge bent activities; Charles Widmore’s connections to Farraday and his Mom Eloise; Jacob and his history with some of the Oceanic survivors; Locke coming back from the dead; Nestor Carbonell’s Richard Alpert never aging.

Questions about the hatch and swan station have been answered, although others remain. I’m still not completely clear about that crazy ball of energy that is the smoke monster and its relation to the shifting time periods or the disappearing island, but so it goes. Our heroes had to get in a plane again and re-crash (or re-something) in order to return to the island - some of them were eventually thrust back in time to join the Dharma people, but in 1977. There are the others; and there are, seemingly, other-others; there are french people; there are the people from the tanker; there are new plane crash survivors; and many of the main characters now have younger versions of themselves - which confuses things when Daniel meets a younger version of his Mom and a child Charlotte; or when Miles (Ken Leung) meets his long dead Dad and his young self. One things for sure, that shifting island can cause a mean nosebleed. Just ask adult Charlotte (Rebecca Mater).

There seems to be a lot of family dysfunction in Lost - especially when it comes to troubled relationships between parents and their kids, and even more specifically fathers and sons, which maybe isn’t so surprising given that is created and mostly written by men. I’d love to know how many of the writers/ producers/show- runners are products of broken families. Is this whole thing about Daddy issues?

There’s one season left. I’ll keep watching and not understanding much. Maybe at some point I’ll get the lead out and go back and watch those episodes I missed and maybe then it will all make sense. I don’t know; I kind of doubt it, but so what - I’m breathing in and out, remaining calm, and allowing myself to experience the series in a no judgement zone. I am one with the island. Namaste.

In Treatment Returns for Season Two

Wednesday, April 22nd, 2009

In Treatment (HBO) Season Two. Executive Producer Rodgrigo Garcia. Starring Gabriel Byrne; Diane Wiest; Hope Davis;  John Mahoney; Alison Pil; Laira robins; Aaron Grady Shaw; Michelle Forbes; Sherri Saum; Russell Hornsby

HBOs critically acclaimed In Treatment has returned for a second season, but while lead Gabriel Byrne is back as pychologist Paul Weston; as is Diane Wiest as his mentor/therapist/friend Gina Toll, we are treated to an entirely new roster of patients. With season one’s Alex (Blair Underwood) having committed suicide; Paul’s messy relationship with Laura (Melissa George) failing to materialize; and his marriage to Kate (Michelle Forbes) kaput, Paul has moved to Brooklyn, NY and started up a new practice, although he still takes the Friday train home to Maryland for the weekend to see his kids, and have a session of his own with Gina 

One thing that hasn’t changed is the instability in Paul’s personal life. A lawsuit has been initiated by Alex’s family (Alex Sr is played by veteran actor Glynn Turman), charging Paul with malpractice for allowing Alex, a military pilot, to fly again. The firm representing Paul and his insurance company turns out to employ a person from Paul’s past, ex-patient Mia (Hope Davis), an attorney who, it is revealed, harbors a longtime resentment toward Paul for moving away twenty years earlier and leaving her without a therapist. 

Conflict of interest is a major theme running through In Treatment, and the soap opera-like drama involving Paul-Alex-Laura-Gina and another new character from Paul’s past, Tammy (Laira Robins) is the weakest element of the show. The drama truly lives and breathes in the smaller moments in the room, many of them played out in something akin to real time. Verbal interchanges taking place between patient and therapist that, while certainly stylized and accelerated for entertainment purposes, nonetheless do justice to the spirit of the process. It’s as if when the writers step away from the confines of the room and get into Paul’s non-professional life they feel the need to ratchet up the stakes, adorning the plot with the kind of embellishments that take the show away from the realm of the special. These moments, and several over-the-top (and also questionably plausible) incidents from season one (i.e. the details surrounding Sophie’s suicide attempt) represent the show’s lowest points, although this is also a series filled with many deeply emotional and highly nuanced moments that are easily on par with the best found in most feature films.    

Schedule-wise, the show is broken up in much the same way as Season 1. HBO plays two half-hour episodes (the first four devoted to a particular day of the week and the individual patients; the last - Friday, to Paul’s visits to Gina) on Sunday Nights and then three more on Mondays. Of course, in the age of the DVR, the episodes are also available in the HBO saved program section in blocks of two weeks worth of shows. It’s a strange format perhaps, although more and more we see programs running on multiple nights (ala American Idol) and non-network cable stations running blocks of programs together so that one can always catch them or catch up.

In addition to Mia, who Paul, in fact, begins to see as a patient once again, we have April (Alison Pil; Milk), a young architectural student with cancer and serious denial issues; Oliver (Aaron Grady Shaw), an African American child who is confused by the separation and impending divorce of his combative parents, Bess (Sherri Saum) and Luke (Russell Hornsby), who attend the sessions with him; and Walter (John Mahoney), a controlling corporate executive suffering panic attacks.  

As the sessions continue we learn more about the lives of these people, their layers revealing themselves to us as they relay their stories to Paul. If the sessions themselves are a bit uneven in terms of the patients behavior (call it dramatic license) the truth of the interaction itself is never anything less than solid. Byrne exudes the kind of measured calm of a professional, consistently volleying and deflecting, gently prodding and provoking, but endeavoring to allow his patients to get to their truths on their own, to experience whatever breakthroughs there are to be had in an organic way. 

HBO is seemingly enamored with the proverbial couch. Dr. Melfi’s relationship with Tony played a huge role in The Sopranos, and there was the one season of Tell Me You Love Me, with the center of the show being Jane Alexander’s therapist character. Creator, Columbian native Rodrigo Garcia (Nine Lives; Ten Tiny Love Stories; Things You Can Tell Just By Looking at Her), comes from a background in film, and like fellow Latin director and friend Alejandro Gonzales Inirrutu, relishes stories with multiple interwoven narratives. As Executive producer, Garcia utilizes a group of talented writers and directors who are obviously dedicated to character and dialogue. It is a testament to Garcia and his cohorts that a show with so little physical movement and so few locations continues to be as compelling as it does.

For the past decade HBO has been on the cutting edge of television, giving us much of the best that the medium has to offer. When In Treatment keeps things small, and focuses on the interaction between therapist and patient, it’s as good as anything out there.

The Wire (2002-2008) R.I.P.

Saturday, November 22nd, 2008

In March 2008, The Wire concluded its five season run on HBO. While initially ignored by almost everyone, The Wire came to be respected as one of the finest series in the history of the medium. Ex-Baltimore Sun reporter David Simon and his partner, Ed Burns, an ex-Baltimore police officer and public school teacher, brought forth their combined knowledge of the workings of inner city Baltimore’s societal and municipal structures to develop a story arc that unfolded over the course of the show’s run.

The Wire addressed the myriad issues that beset our metropolitan centers: race; discrimination; ethnicity; political muscle; the power of the press; shifting economies within our media; the death of traditional industries; violence; education and our inner-city public schools; changing labor unions; social welfare; the path of city and state government funding; the infiltration and subsequent chain of illegal moneys into our economies; police, legal & political corruption; upward mobility; the influence of black churches; immigration; alcoholism and drug abuse; recovery; family dysfunction; mentorship; and prison. Among other things, the series was at once a commentary on our institutions; a police and prosecutorial procedural; and a crime drama, but mostly it was about individuals living their lives within the larger context.

In attempting to categorize what made The Wire different from anything that preceded it, one element that should be mentioned was its wide use of African American characters. Unlike so much of what we see on television and in the movies, The Wire showed us wealthy, middle class, working class, poor, and completely marginalized black characters, all within a single panoramic view. What differentiated it further, however, is that not only did it show many of the faces of black urban America, it also painted members of each rung of this complex strata as morally complex. 

As more information emerged about casting and production, it became clear that Simon and Burns, et al, were always careful to confirm with people who had lived similar lives to those being portrayed that the dialogue and behavior was on target. This meant talking to actual cops; dock workers; union delegates; reporters; drug rehab specialists; addicts; ex-cons; criminals; attorneys; and politicians. As Simon has described, the script was written for the “people living these lives” as opposed to television’s normal target audience, largely constituting white suburbanites. The attitude was, “if they don’t get it, fuck em”. This same approach played itself out in casting, with non-professionals woven into the cast with experienced actors. Watching The Wire, one never had the feeling that the situations, characters, or story lines were implausible – from the very beginning the show smacked of authenticity.

Author David Simon’s first book was turned into television’s Homicide: Life on the Streets. For his second, he collaborated with Burns on a searing piece of reportage, The Corner, detailing life in a Baltimore neighborhood infested with drugs and poverty. Filled with memorable characters, and gritty sub-plots, The Corner later became an acclaimed mini-series on HBO, and thusly a kind of archetypal blueprint. For The Wire, Simon and Burns enlisted numerous experts to assist them, including journalist Bill Zorzi; journalist and ex-port worker Rafael Alvarez, and crime writers like George Pelicanos; Dennis Lehane; and Richard Price. Directors like Ernest Dickerson, Brad Anderson, and Agnieska Holland - known more for their film work, were also employed. 

There were numerous standout characters populating the story-lines over the course of five memorable seasons. Though police officer Jimmy McNulty (Aussie Dominic West) might have been the nominal lead, the heart and soul of the whole affair just might well have been “Bubbles” or “Bubs,” wonderfully played by Andre Royo. A long time intravenous heroin user and police informant, Bubs eventually finds sobriety, and in the process discovers (to his own amazement) that he somehow wasn’t infected by the HIV virus. Throughout the life of the show, Royo somehow managed, despite Bubble’s outward appearance to the world, to continuously convey a certain indomitable spirit residing within the character. 

We followed Bubble’s journey through the five seasons – one that included beatings, overdoses, horrible living conditions, and the death of his one time running partner. In the end, Bubs, clean and sober for months, has his story depicted in the newspaper, is living with his sister (albeit in the basement), and is beginning to look at himself in a different way. The beauty of the extended format is that we were able to see events in the lives of some of these characters play out over the course of multiple years in something resembling real time.

Though The Wire was full of hundreds of characters we came to know, and love, like or detest (Stringer Bell; Burell; D’Angelo and Avon Barksdale; Rhonda; Omar; Snoop; Spiros; The Greek; Chris; Proposition Joe; Mayor Carcetti; Michael; Namond; Dukie; Prezlewski; Kima;  Cuddy; Bunk; Lester; Cedric Daniels, Sydnor; Wee-Boy; Maury Levy; Slim; Rawls; Ziggy; Scott; Norman; Royce; Marlo; Bodie; Herc; Carver; Beadie; Gus; Cheese; Sobotka), what was perhaps most interesting about their character arcs was that their success or failure often-times had little to nothing to do with like-ablity, ambition, drive, or anything readily identifiable in their character. Instead, individual fates were often based in large part on some elusive elixir of inherent gifts and circumstance, and sometimes by acts of fortitude or manipulation or pure dumb luck (and their opposites). When it came to season three’s middle schoolers, the most cowardly and generally unappealing of the bunch Namond (Julito McCullum) winds up in a stable home doing well; strong, proud Michael (Tristan Wilds) becomes immersed in a sea of violence; operator Randy (Maestro Harrell) winds up in foster care; and kind, sensitive Dukie (Jermaine Crawford), the weakest, gets thrown to the wolves, likely destined to become another Bubs. 

Omar (Michael K. Williams), the criminal vigilante with the drug-dealer-robbing modus operandi, once said, “a man’s gotta have a code”.  The Wire was often about that very subject – personal codes. Whether it was a journalist making up a story for print; a cop manufacturing murder cases or letting down an informant; a drug dealer turning on a friend because it’s “just business”; or a politico making a deal with the devil, the stories were often based on balancing personal ethics with the desire for money, power, recognition, and/or mere survival, and, at their root, those individual choices differed little whether one was a thirteen year old drug runner or a sixty year old long-time political player.  

Like the mutable morality that cut across all social/racial/economic and institutional lines, The Wire itself was never afraid to bounce around. After a critically successful Season One that looked at police chasing after drug sellers, the logical thing to do may have been to keep on with what was working. Instead, in Season 2 a radical shift was made (albeit a pre-planned one), introducing a whole set of new characters in their examination of the waterfront and it’s workers. As the seasons progressed - often, episodes would go by without seeing one or more of the main characters, but somehow when we floated back to them it always felt natural – as if, life continued to go on whether we were looking at them or not. Through seasons examining the machinations of city and state politics and police departments; the failure of our public schools; and the current financial and ethical position of our press, The Wire managed to balance the mix of the personal and institutional.  

Like all good drama the characters were a melange of conflicting qualities – McNulty a hopeless alcoholic and womanizer, but underneath a kind of good guy rebel, a solid cop; Bunk, a drunk himself, lazy, a bit arrogant but solid too; Marlo, someone to respect for his courage and leadership ability, but a cold blooded killer. There were a number of gay characters too - Omar, Snoop, Kima, none of them demonized (or at least not because of their sexual preferences), all of them multi-faceted, all of them representing in their own way the conflicts and dualities that come with alternative lifestyles within the context of their community.   

The Wire worked for many obvious reasons – great writing, terrific camera work, a fantastic sense of place; complex and changing story lines. It wasn’t afraid to be sincere – especially when tackling big, unwieldy topics too often left untouched, but it also knew when to pull back from the social commentary and let the characters joke and get drunk and have sex and moan and groan and do what we all do to try to make it day to day. Sure, there were some cliché moments here and there (including a somewhat shaky last episode), but our lives are nothing if not cliché. It struck a nearly impossible balance between the sensational and mundane. Incisive, intelligent, and courageous, The Wire just might have been filled with more humanity than anything that has ever hit the airwaves. It’s dedication to what is real was felt at every level, throughout every chacracter, plot line,  and season, and those who immersed themselves in it enjoyed the ride every step of the way, and even now bemoan the loss.